Jim Holloway vs. Jason Pearson — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Jim Holloway and Jason Pearson are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jason Pearson posted stronger numbers in WHIP (3.000 vs 3.214) and home runs allowed (3.38 per nine innings vs 3.86). Jim Holloway had the advantage in ERA (13.5 vs 23.63). By the career numbers, Jason Pearson had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.