Clarence Hoffman vs. John O'Neil — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Clarence Hoffman posted the stronger offensive profile against John O'Neil. Clarence Hoffman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.669 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.307 vs .000). By the career numbers, Clarence Hoffman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Clarence Hoffman and John O'Neil
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
107
174.46
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
4
160
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
368
600
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
15
600
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.009
0.009
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
42.39
69.11
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
-1.52
-60.85
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
13.14
13.14
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
7.5
7.5
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Clarence Hoffman and John O'Neil
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
88
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.95
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
245
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
29
6.87
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
241
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
6.39
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.37
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.1
93.1
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.739
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.75
6.75
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.24
Clarence Hoffman
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.66