Rece Hinds vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Rece Hinds. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .748) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .242). Rece Hinds had the advantage in home run production (7 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Rece Hinds and Jim Smith
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.763
0.763
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.765
0.765
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.506
0.506
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.315
0.315
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 600 PA
10.65
67.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Rece Hinds and Jim Smith
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
1.46
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
0.93
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
2.51
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
2.51
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.722
1.722
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Rece Hinds
Career
Per 9 Innings
63.89
63.89
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100