Henry Henderson vs. Jim McLaughlin — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Henry Henderson posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLaughlin. Henry Henderson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.781 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.318 vs .000). By the career numbers, Henry Henderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Henry Henderson and Jim McLaughlin
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
22
155.29
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
85
600
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.791
0.791
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
22
155.29
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
13.34
94.14
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.1
-60
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Henry Henderson and Jim McLaughlin
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
1.1
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
226
11.26
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.69
98.69
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.273
10.273
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Henry Henderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim McLaughlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0