Fred Hayner vs. Stu Tate — Career Comparison
On the career pitching numbers, Stu Tate posted a stronger line than Fred Hayner. Stu Tate posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.38 vs 13.5) and WHIP (1.125 vs 3.000). By the career numbers, Stu Tate had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.
Pitching Stats for Fred Hayner and Stu Tate
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
16.88
16.88
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.27
2.27
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
12.75
12.75
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.368
0.368
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.25
0.25
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
15.75
15.75
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.13
10.13
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.5
4.5
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
11.25
11.25
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.25
2.25
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
13.5
13.5
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
1.5
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
1.5
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
20.25
20.25
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.13
10.13
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
42.75
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
40.5
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
1.5
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.313
0.313
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.375
0.375
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
54
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
40.5
40.5
Fielding Stats for Fred Hayner and Stu Tate
Fred Hayner
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Stu Tate
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
6.75