Thorny Hawkes vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Thorny Hawkes. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .524) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .249). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Thorny Hawkes and Jim Smith
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
409
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.528
0.528
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.138
0.138
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.249
0.249
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.04
0.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.384
0.384
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
31.07
45.57
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 600 PA
29.21
29.21
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Thorny Hawkes and Jim Smith
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
104
1.05
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
2685
27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
27
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
797
8.01
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
719
7.23
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.21
90.21
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Thorny Hawkes
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.914
6.914
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5