Arnold Hauser vs. Ed McLane — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Arnold Hauser posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McLane. Arnold Hauser posted stronger numbers in OPS (.605 vs .333) and slugging (.300 vs .000). Ed McLane had the advantage in on-base percentage (.333 vs .305). By the career numbers, Arnold Hauser had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Arnold Hauser and Ed McLane
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
1675
600
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.669
0.669
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
158.26
56.69
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
10.43
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
0.582
0.582
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 600 PA
176.11
63.09
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
24.28
Fielding Stats for Arnold Hauser and Ed McLane
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
420
3.78
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
115
1.04
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
2997
27
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
2170
19.55
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
2007
18.08
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.49
92.49
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.779
4.779
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Arnold Hauser
Career
Per 9 Innings
27.38
27.38
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100