Arthur Hauger vs. Bama Rowell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Bama Rowell posted the stronger offensive profile against Arthur Hauger. Bama Rowell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.699 vs .161) and on-base percentage (.316 vs .105). By the career numbers, Bama Rowell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Arthur Hauger and Bama Rowell
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
15
473.68
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
574
168.58
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
19
600
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
2043
600
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.723
0.723
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.11
3.48
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
232.61
68.31
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
1
31.58
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
727
213.51
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
2
63.16
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
638
187.37
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.382
0.382
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.238
0.238
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.627
0.627
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
6
189.47
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
105
30.84
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
3.17
3.17
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
19.46
19.46
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
1.08
1.08
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 600 PA
23
6.75
Fielding Stats for Arthur Hauger and Bama Rowell
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 9 Innings
509
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1791
Arthur Hauger
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Bama Rowell
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.26