Scott Hardesty vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Scott Hardesty. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .465) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .243). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Scott Hardesty and Jim Smith
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
76
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.509
0.509
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
4.05
32.01
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.165
0.165
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
4.89
38.6
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 600 PA
7.6
7.6
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Scott Hardesty and Jim Smith
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
1.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
474
27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
27
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
128
7.29
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
116
6.61
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.63
90.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Scott Hardesty
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.273
5.273
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5