Pat Hannivan vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Pat Hannivan. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .625) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .375). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pat Hannivan and Jim Smith
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.805
0.805
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
3.33
76.79
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.867
0.867
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
3.54
81.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Pat Hannivan and Jim Smith
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.92
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
4.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
3.49
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.36
86.36
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100