Ned Hanlon vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ned Hanlon. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .663) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .324). Ned Hanlon had the advantage in home run production (30 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ned Hanlon and Jim Smith
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.722
0.722
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
659.78
70.98
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.339
0.339
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
717.35
77.18
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
15.62
15.62
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Ned Hanlon and Jim Smith
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1274
1.02
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
3322
2.67
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2952
2.37
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.86
88.86
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ned Hanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.317
2.317
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5