Gene Handley vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Gene Handley. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .633) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .316). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Gene Handley and Jim Smith
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.252
0.252
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.668
0.668
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.186
0.186
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
34.45
54.54
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.065
0.065
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.558
0.558
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
38.55
61.03
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
14.04
14.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Gene Handley
Career
Per 600 PA
9
14.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Gene Handley and Jim Smith
Gene Handley
Career
Per 9 Innings
101
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Gene Handley
Career
Per 9 Innings
416
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Gene Handley
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.55
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100