Garvin Hamner vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Garvin Hamner. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .478) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Garvin Hamner and Jim Smith
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
109
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.198
0.198
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.515
0.515
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
5.6
30.85
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
0.03
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.381
0.381
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
5.68
31.26
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
12.11
12.11
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 600 PA
3
16.51
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Garvin Hamner and Jim Smith
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 9 Innings
147
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Garvin Hamner
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.74
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100