Jeff Hamilton vs. Tom Stanton — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jeff Hamilton posted the stronger offensive profile against Tom Stanton. Jeff Hamilton posted stronger numbers in OPS (.618 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.268 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jeff Hamilton had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jeff Hamilton and Tom Stanton
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
416
196.07
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
1273
600
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
108.56
51.17
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.31
-62.13
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
6.03
6.03
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 600 PA
24
11.31
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jeff Hamilton and Tom Stanton
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
399
1.26
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
302
0.95
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
8552
27
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
27
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
2850.2
9
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
9
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
297
0.94
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
5.14
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
596
1.88
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
941
2.97
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
6.43
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
893
2.82
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
6.43
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.9
94.9
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.238
2.238
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
75.69
75.69
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jeff Hamilton
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Tom Stanton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29