Jim Hamby vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Leo Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Hamby. Leo Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .492) and on-base percentage (.283 vs .274). By the career numbers, Leo Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Hamby and Leo Smith
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.537
0.537
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.036
0.036
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
4.37
42.32
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Hamby and Leo Smith
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.45
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.171
5.171