Jim Hamby vs. John Mulligan — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Hamby and John Mulligan are closely matched on the surface stats. John Mulligan posted stronger numbers in slugging (.250 vs .218) and batting average (.250 vs .182). Jim Hamby had the advantage in on-base percentage (.274 vs .250). By the career numbers, John Mulligan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Hamby and John Mulligan
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.537
0.537
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
3.95
38.27
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
4.37
42.32
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
45.21
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 600 PA
8.86
8.86
John Mulligan
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Hamby and John Mulligan
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
John Mulligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.69
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
John Mulligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
4.85
Jim Hamby
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.46
John Mulligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100