Greg Halman vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Greg Halman. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .535) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .233). Greg Halman had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Greg Halman and Jim Smith
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.581
0.581
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.302
0.302
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.095
0.095
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.474
0.474
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Greg Halman
Career
Per 600 PA
8.09
40.11
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Greg Halman and Jim Smith
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
1.31
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
0.95
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
79
2.35
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
79
2.35
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.796
1.796
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Greg Halman
Career
Per 9 Innings
72.73
72.73
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100