John Haldeman vs. Jim Spencer — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Spencer posted the stronger offensive profile against John Haldeman. Jim Spencer posted stronger numbers in OPS (.705 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.318 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Spencer had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Haldeman and Jim Spencer
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
1553
172.27
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
5409
600
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.307
0.307
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
9.29
9.29
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 600 PA
124
13.75
Fielding Stats for John Haldeman and Jim Spencer
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
1245
1.11
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
27
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
30325
27
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
10108.1
9
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
7
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
10773
9.59
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
10718
9.54
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.49
99.49
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Spencer
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.609
8.609