John Haldeman vs. Earl Richardson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earl Richardson posted the stronger offensive profile against John Haldeman. Earl Richardson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.306 vs .000). By the career numbers, Earl Richardson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Haldeman and Earl Richardson
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 600 PA
11
132
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 600 PA
50
600
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.306
0.306
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
John Haldeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for John Haldeman and Earl Richardson
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.05
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.05
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
27
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
282
27
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
94
9
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
3.06
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
7
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
58
5.55
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
52
4.98
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.66
89.66
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.727
4.727
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
John Haldeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Earl Richardson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0