Ed Haigh vs. Pat Patterson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pat Patterson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Haigh. Pat Patterson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.868 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.377 vs .250). By the career numbers, Pat Patterson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Haigh and Pat Patterson
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
1374
600
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.326
0.326
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.88
0.88
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
230.72
100.75
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.377
0.377
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.491
0.491
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.871
0.871
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
41.68
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
248.08
108.33
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
274.8
274.8
Fielding Stats for Ed Haigh and Pat Patterson
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 9 Innings
330
1.1
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Pat Patterson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2695.1
9