Ed Haigh vs. John Patterson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Patterson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Haigh. John Patterson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.577 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.290 vs .250). Ed Haigh had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .215). By the career numbers, John Patterson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Haigh and John Patterson
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
636
600
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
50.38
47.53
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.525
0.525
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
41.68
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
51.33
48.42
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
5.63
5.63
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John Patterson
Career
Per 600 PA
13
12.26
Fielding Stats for Ed Haigh and John Patterson
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
John Patterson
Career
Per 9 Innings
143
1.19
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
John Patterson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1081.2
9