Ed Haigh vs. Pat Newnam — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pat Newnam posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Haigh. Pat Newnam posted stronger numbers in OPS (.565 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.287 vs .250). Ed Haigh had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .213). By the career numbers, Pat Newnam had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Haigh and Pat Newnam
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.624
0.624
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.541
0.541
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
41.68
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
46.09
55.31
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
6.02
6.02
Fielding Stats for Ed Haigh and Pat Newnam
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
123
1.23