Jim Hackett vs. Dan Tye — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Hackett posted the stronger offensive profile against Dan Tye. Jim Hackett posted stronger numbers in OPS (.588 vs .467) and on-base percentage (.276 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim Hackett had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Hackett and Dan Tye
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.276
0.276
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.081
0.081
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.497
0.497
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
36.64
55.38
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.71
28.42
Fielding Stats for Jim Hackett and Dan Tye
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
1.05
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.25
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1047
10.81
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.75
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1015
10.48
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.5
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.94
96.94
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.71
85.71
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.951
9.951
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.2
1.2