Jim Hackett vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Hackett. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .588) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .276). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Hackett and Jim Smith
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
33.59
50.76
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.276
0.276
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.081
0.081
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.497
0.497
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
36.64
55.38
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Jim Hackett and Jim Smith
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
1.05
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1047
10.81
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1015
10.48
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.94
96.94
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.951
9.951
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5