Jim Gleeson vs. Ray Poole — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Gleeson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ray Poole. Jim Gleeson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.741 vs .450) and on-base percentage (.350 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Gleeson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Gleeson and Ray Poole
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
392
159.89
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
15
562.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
1471
600
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.767
0.767
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
186.16
75.93
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.48
17.89
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.717
0.717
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
194.14
79.19
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
18.9
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
10.01
10.01
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
3.2
3.2
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.07
1.07
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
21
8.57
Ray Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5