Jim Gladd vs. Michael Young — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Michael Young posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Gladd. Michael Young posted stronger numbers in OPS (.789 vs .258) and on-base percentage (.348 vs .167). By the career numbers, Michael Young had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Gladd and Michael Young
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
4
200
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
1970
137.25
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
8612
600
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.801
0.801
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
9.01
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
1156.87
80.6
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
2
100
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
2972
207.06
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.346
0.346
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.441
0.441
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.098
0.098
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.719
0.719
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
6.97
6.97
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Michael Young
Career
Per 600 PA
236
16.44
Fielding Stats for Jim Gladd and Michael Young
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Michael Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1817
1.06
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
Michael Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
7569
4.4
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
Michael Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
7409
4.31
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Michael Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.89
97.89
Jim Gladd
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.25
Michael Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.078
4.078