Thomas Gilmore vs. Al Nevin — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Thomas Gilmore and Al Nevin are closely matched on the surface stats. Thomas Gilmore posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.250 vs .214) and batting average (.250 vs .200). Al Nevin had the advantage in slugging (.291 vs .250). By the career numbers, Thomas Gilmore had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Thomas Gilmore and Al Nevin
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
56
600
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.509
0.509
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
34.02
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
3.22
34.49
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.378
0.378
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0.87
43.44
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
3.22
34.49
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
1
10.71
Fielding Stats for Thomas Gilmore and Al Nevin
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.24
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.24
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
3.41
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
59
5.21
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
2.48
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
3
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 9 Innings
72.73
72.73
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.63
57.63
Thomas Gilmore
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.429
2.429