Jim Gill vs. Chris McFarland — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Gill posted the stronger offensive profile against Chris McFarland. Jim Gill posted stronger numbers in OPS (.708 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .214). By the career numbers, Jim Gill had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Gill and Chris McFarland
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
2
133.33
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
9
600
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.804
0.804
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1
66.67
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1
42.86
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1.27
84.62
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
35.4
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.168
0.168
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
80.41
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.82
35.02
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
4.5
4.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Gill and Chris McFarland
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.09
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
3.86
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.91
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.43
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.09
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.14
57.14