Jim Gill vs. Jack Lapp — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Gill and Jack Lapp are closely matched on the surface stats. Jack Lapp posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.340 vs .333) and batting average (.263 vs .250). Jim Gill had the advantage in OPS (.708 vs .683). By the career numbers, Jack Lapp had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Gill and Jack Lapp
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.804
0.804
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.707
0.707
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.216
0.216
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.629
0.629
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
80.41
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
219.95
72.95
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
4.5
4.5
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
10.34
10.34
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
1.01
1.01
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
1
66.67
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
31
10.28
Jim Gill
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 600 PA
51.61
51.61
Fielding Stats for Jim Gill and Jack Lapp
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
520
6.28
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
3.86
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
3145
37.99
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
3.43
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
3050
36.85
Jim Gill
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
Jack Lapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.98
96.98