George Genovese vs. Chris McFarland — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, George Genovese and Chris McFarland are closely matched on the surface stats. Chris McFarland posted stronger numbers in slugging (.286 vs .000) and batting average (.214 vs .000). George Genovese had the advantage in on-base percentage (.500 vs .214). By the career numbers, Chris McFarland had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for George Genovese and Chris McFarland
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
3
900
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
29.73
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
35.4
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.168
0.168
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
2
85.71
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
68.03
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.82
35.02
George Genovese
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chris McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0