Steve Geltz vs. Jim Konstanty — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Steve Geltz and Jim Konstanty are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jim Konstanty posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.46 vs 4.23) and home runs allowed (0.84 per nine innings vs 1.9). Steve Geltz had the advantage in WHIP (1.179 vs 1.300). By the career numbers, Jim Konstanty had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.