Pete Galligan vs. Ed Young — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Young posted the stronger offensive profile against Pete Galligan. Ed Young posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.338 vs .200). By the career numbers, Ed Young had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Galligan and Ed Young
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.64
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
97.32
80.21
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.726
0.726
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
20.56
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
104.56
86.18
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
2.5
2.5
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
182
182
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.82
Fielding Stats for Pete Galligan and Ed Young
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.75
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
186
1.12
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
9
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1490.1
9
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
6
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1677
10.13
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
5.25
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1620
9.78
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.6
96.6
Pete Galligan
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
7
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.71
8.71