Charles Fuller vs. Jim Roxburgh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh posted the stronger offensive profile against Charles Fuller. Jim Roxburgh posted stronger numbers in OPS (.607 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Charles Fuller and Jim Roxburgh
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
3
180
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
4
171.43
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.88
-52.77
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.58
67.75
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Charles Fuller and Jim Roxburgh
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.42
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.5
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
57
27
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
27
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
9
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
9
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
5.21
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
5.4
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
5.68
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
8.4
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
5.68
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
6.9
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.14
82.14
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.6
4.6
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.89
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Charles Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.47
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0