John Fuller vs. Nat Rogers — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Nat Rogers posted the stronger offensive profile against John Fuller. Nat Rogers posted stronger numbers in OPS (.758 vs .667) and on-base percentage (.355 vs .333). John Fuller had the advantage in batting average (.333 vs .302). By the career numbers, Nat Rogers had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Fuller and Nat Rogers
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
2043
600
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.302
0.302
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.783
0.783
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
61.11
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
277.28
81.43
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.355
0.355
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.403
0.403
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.722
0.722
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.41
82.59
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
308.23
90.52
John Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.29
Fielding Stats for John Fuller and Nat Rogers
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
516
1.12
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
4131.1
9
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
862
1.88
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
829
1.81
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.17
96.17
John Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Nat Rogers
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.607
1.607