Frank Fuller vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Frank Fuller. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .472) and slugging (.237 vs .175). Frank Fuller had the advantage in on-base percentage (.297 vs .248). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Frank Fuller and Jim McLeod
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
75
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.562
0.562
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
4.11
32.89
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.297
0.297
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
4.34
34.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
6.25
6.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.92
0.92
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
10
80
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 600 PA
60
60
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Fielding Stats for Frank Fuller and Jim McLeod
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Frank Fuller
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.94
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7