Pete Fox vs. Jim Roxburgh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Fox posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Roxburgh. Pete Fox posted stronger numbers in OPS (.762 vs .607) and slugging (.415 vs .250). Jim Roxburgh had the advantage in on-base percentage (.357 vs .347). By the career numbers, Pete Fox had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Fox and Jim Roxburgh
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
1461
142.12
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
4
171.43
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
6168
600
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.78
0.78
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
809.52
78.75
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
51.67
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
2103
204.57
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
5
214.29
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.347
0.347
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.715
0.715
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
1524
148.25
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1
42.86
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
876.68
85.28
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.58
67.75
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
13.1
13.1
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.83
0.83
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
48
4.67
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Pete Fox and Jim Roxburgh
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1368
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.5
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
2889
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
6.9
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.7
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.14
82.14