Pete Fox vs. Phil Reardon — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Fox posted the stronger offensive profile against Phil Reardon. Pete Fox posted stronger numbers in OPS (.762 vs .205) and on-base percentage (.347 vs .133). By the career numbers, Pete Fox had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Fox and Phil Reardon
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
6168
600
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
15
600
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.78
0.78
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.347
0.347
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.133
0.133
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.078
0.078
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.715
0.715
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
13.1
13.1
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
7.5
7.5
Pete Fox
Career
Per 600 PA
48
4.67
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Pete Fox and Phil Reardon
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1368
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.9
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
2889
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
2.48
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.7
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.67
91.67
Pete Fox
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.112
Phil Reardon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.75
2.75