Matt Foster vs. George Haddock — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, Matt Foster and George Haddock are fairly close on the surface numbers. George Haddock posted stronger numbers in ERA (4.07 vs 4.3) and home runs allowed (0.32 per nine innings vs 1.36). Matt Foster had the advantage in WHIP (1.274 vs 1.496). By the career numbers, George Haddock had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.