Tom Fleming vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .238). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Fleming and Unknown Proctor
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
30
171.43
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
105
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
0.522
0.522
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
24
137.14
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
0.238
0.238
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
6.94
39.64
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
9.55
9.55
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Tom Fleming and Unknown Proctor
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
1.27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 9 Innings
594
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 9 Innings
198
9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Tom Fleming
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0