Sam Field vs. John Hanna — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Sam Field and John Hanna are closely matched on the surface stats. Sam Field had the edge in batting average (.146 vs .126). By the career numbers, Sam Field had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Sam Field and John Hanna
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.126
0.126
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.337
0.337
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.112
0.112
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.114
0.114
Sam Field
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
John Hanna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Fielding Stats for Sam Field and John Hanna
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.29
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
1.07
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
66
6.53
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
322
7.47
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
47
4.65
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
287
6.66
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
71.21
71.21
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.13
89.13
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.615
3.615
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.239
6.239
Sam Field
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.38
John Hanna
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1.23