Daniel Fields vs. Jim Zapp — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Zapp. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .780) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .324). Jim Zapp had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Zapp
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.784
0.784
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.456
0.456
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
10.63
86.18
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 600 PA
74
74
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Zapp
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
1.16
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
2.33
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
38
2.21
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim Zapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
95
95