Daniel Fields vs. Jim Viox — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Daniel Fields and Jim Viox are closely matched on the surface stats. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .719) and slugging (.667 vs .358). Jim Viox had the advantage in on-base percentage (.361 vs .333). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Viox
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
1989
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.755
0.755
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
0.23
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.361
0.361
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.358
0.358
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.085
0.085
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.252
0.252
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
270.36
81.56
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Viox
Career
Per 600 PA
17.76
17.76
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Viox
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jim Viox
Career
Per 9 Innings
483
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Jim Viox
Career
Per 9 Innings
2039
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim Viox
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.49