Daniel Fields vs. Ed Roetz — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Roetz. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .684) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .306). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Ed Roetz
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.706
0.706
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.455
0.455
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.306
0.306
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.378
0.378
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.133
0.133
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
5.64
66.38
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 600 PA
8.5
8.5
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Ed Roetz
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 9 Innings
89
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Ed Roetz
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.71