Daniel Fields vs. Jim Ritz — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Ritz. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .200). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Ritz
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.06
7.11
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim Ritz
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
3.6
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75