Daniel Fields vs. Earl Pruess — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Earl Pruess had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .333). By the career numbers, Earl Pruess had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Earl Pruess
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1.875
1.875
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
317.25
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Earl Pruess
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Earl Pruess
Career
Per 9 Innings
100