Daniel Fields vs. John Potts — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Daniel Fields and John Potts are closely matched on the surface stats. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .747) and slugging (.667 vs .333). John Potts had the advantage in on-base percentage (.414 vs .333). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and John Potts
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
133
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.828
0.828
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
19.39
87.46
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.414
0.414
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.069
0.069
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
20.2
91.12
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
John Potts
Career
Per 600 PA
10.23
10.23
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and John Potts
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
John Potts
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
John Potts
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
John Potts
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.33