Daniel Fields vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .248). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim McLeod
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Daniel Fields and Jim McLeod
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7