Sal Fasano vs. Pete McClanahan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Sal Fasano. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .688) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .296). Sal Fasano had the advantage in home run production (47 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Sal Fasano and Pete McClanahan
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
427
205.78
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
1245
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.703
0.703
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
134.43
64.79
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
435
209.64
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
364
175.42
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
229
110.36
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
127.99
61.68
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
3.81
3.81
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Sal Fasano
Career
Per 600 PA
26
12.53
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0