Jim Fanning vs. Baby Webb — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Baby Webb posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Fanning. Baby Webb posted stronger numbers in OPS (.473 vs .399) and on-base percentage (.273 vs .215). By the career numbers, Baby Webb had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Fanning and Baby Webb
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.542
0.542
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
0.21
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
1.51
6.09
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.77
38.32
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 600 PA
9
36.24
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Fanning and Baby Webb
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 9 Innings
52
1.32
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 9 Innings
243
6.15
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
10.13
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 9 Innings
238
6.02
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
9.75
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.94
97.94
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.3
96.3
Jim Fanning
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.577
4.577
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.667
8.667