Adam Everett vs. John Kenney — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Adam Everett posted the stronger offensive profile against John Kenney. Adam Everett posted stronger numbers in OPS (.643 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.297 vs .000). By the career numbers, Adam Everett had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Adam Everett and John Kenney
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
880
171.99
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
5
157.89
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
3070
600
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
19
600
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.294
0.294
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
577
112.77
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
1
31.58
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
6.75
6.75
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
19
19
Adam Everett
Career
Per 600 PA
35
6.84
John Kenney
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Adam Everett and John Kenney
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
852
1.11
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.17
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
790
1.03
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.98
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
20774
27
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
138
27
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
6924.2
9
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
9
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1171
1.52
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.76
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
2361
3.07
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
0.78
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
3621
4.71
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
4.11
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
3532
4.59
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
2.54
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.54
97.54
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
61.9
61.9
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.146
4.146
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.167
2.167
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.72
92.72
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Adam Everett
Career
Per 9 Innings
521
0.68
John Kenney
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.2